|
KMID : 1234820170180020105
|
|
Korean Society of Law and Medicine
2017 Volume.18 No. 2 p.105 ~ p.138
|
|
|
Patient’s right of self-determination and informed refusal: case comments
|
|
Bae Hyun-Ah
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
This is case comments of several representative legal cases regarding self- determination right of patient. In a case in which an intoxicated patient attempted suicide refusing treatment, the Supreme Court ruled that the medical team’s respect for the patient’s decision was an act of malpractice, and that in particular medical situations (medical emergencies) the physician’s duty to preserve life supersedes the patient’s rights to autonomy. Afterwards, at the request of the patient’s family, and considering the patient’s condition (irrecoverable death stage ,etc.) consistent with a persistent vegetative state, the Supreme Court deduced the patient’s intention and decide to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. More recently, regarding patients who refuse blood transfusions or other necessary treatment due to religious beliefs, the Supreme Court established a standard of judgment that can be seen as conferring equal value to the physician’s duty to respect patient autonomy and to preserve life. An empirical study of legal precedent with regard to cases in which the physician’s duty to preserve life conflicts with the patient’s autonomy, grounded in respect for human dignity, can reveal how the Court’s perspective has reflected the role of the patient as a decision-making subject and ways of respecting autonomy in Korean society, and how the Court’s stance has changed alongside changing societal beliefs. The Court has shifted from judging the right to life as the foremost value and prioritizing this over the patient’s autonomy, to beginning to at least consider the patient’s formally stated or deducible wishes when withholding or withdrawing treatment, and to considering exercises of self determination right based on religious belief or certain other justifications with informed refusal. This will have a substantial impact on medical community going forward, and provide implicit and explicit guidance for physicians who are practicing medicine within this environment.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
self-determination right, informed consent, informed refusal, capacity
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|